Jon Kunac-Tabinor Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 Hi Gang - heres what getting up at 5 am for abit of dawn modelling gets you. This is the new Airfix model - with cockpit pretty much out of the box except for some seat straps and a replacement head armour from styrene sheet ( which I now think shouldn't be there at all for an early Mk 1 - oh well...). Oh and a new map case from wine foil - which I've painted in a canvas colour to add a bit of life! All I've done is paint with Xtracrylics interior grey green, and then add washes and details from vallejo and citadel ranges. The canopy will be closed on this model, so I reckon this amount of detail will suffice. I've also made a curved bottom "floor' for the cockpit to simulate the lower fuselage interior. Also theres a pic of the fabric ailerons - toned down with some Mr Surfacer 1000 and a bit of sanding. So far, a trial fit of parts , and actual gluing of wings has shown a pretty good fit. I've sanding down the inner trailing edges of the wing halves to thin them dowm, and done similar to the rear fuselage rudder fin area- as it all seemed a bit chunky to me. As usual the photos reveal far more imperfections than my naked eye can pick up All comments welcome Cheers Jon KT
Jon Kunac-Tabinor Posted July 28, 2007 Author Posted July 28, 2007 Wasn't the seat on early Spitfire's a red colour? Hi Daz - my understanding, is that very early Spits had metal seats - so it would be grey green. The red-brown phenolic resin (?) seat was introduced when it was thought the aluminium seat might buckle under high G manouevres. At least thats what I thought - I'm sure Edgar or John Adams will confirm or refute this...after the cockpit is all glued in place of course! Cheers Jon KT
Edgar Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 (edited) The "plastic" seat was introduced (as an extra option, not a replacement) from 14-5-1940. It was strengthened 19-4-1942. The crowbar wasn't introduced until 4-11-1941. Rear armour protection was introduced from 6-2-1940. Since this is BRITmodeller, the dates are d/m/y, before anyone asks Edgar Edited July 28, 2007 by Edgar
Mike Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 The "plastic" seat was introduced (as an extra option, not a replacement) from 14-5-1940. It was strengthened 19-4-1942. The crowbar wasn't introduced until 4-11-1941. Rear armour protection was introduced from 6-2-1940. Since this is BRITmodeller, the dates are d/m/y, before anyone asks Edgar ...and there was me wondering what month 14 was called! Septober, Octember, Nowonder?
Jon Kunac-Tabinor Posted July 28, 2007 Author Posted July 28, 2007 The "plastic" seat was introduced (as an extra option, not a replacement) from 14-5-1940. It was strengthened 19-4-1942. The crowbar wasn't introduced until 4-11-1941. Rear armour protection was introduced from 6-2-1940. Since this is BRITmodeller, the dates are d/m/y, before anyone asks Edgar Hi Edgar - I knew I'd duff it all up. I reckon I can get the head armour out, so at least that will make the cockpit look emptier.I didnt realise the crowbar was installed so late - all those BoB models we see with it are wrong then? Cheers jon KT
Edgar Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 Hi Edgar - I knew I'd duff it all up. I reckon I can get the head armour out, so at least that will make the cockpit look emptier.I didnt realise the crowbar was installed so late - all those BoB models we see with it are wrong then?Cheers jon KT 'Fraid so (though I wouldn't call it "duffed up." How many chances do you get to trawl through the RAF Museum's archives?), and a red one (on so many models)just compounds the felony; I think that was a post-war H&S special. I was looking at a display, several years ago, at a Shuttleworth model show, when the man, standing next to me, said "All these lovely models, but, do you know, all the time, during the war, that I flew Spitfires, I never saw a red crowbar; black, green, silver, yes, but red, never." Edgar
Edgar Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 ...and there was me wondering what month 14 was called! Septober, Octember, Nowonder? Oh, Lord, now he needs to prove that he can count Edgar
dylan the rabbit Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 'Fraid so (though I wouldn't call it "duffed up." How many chances do you get to trawl through the RAF Museum's archives?), and a red one (on so many models)just compounds the felony; I think that was a post-war H&S special. I was looking at a display, several years ago, at a Shuttleworth model show, when the man, standing next to me, said "All these lovely models, but, do you know, all the time, during the war, that I flew Spitfires, I never saw a red crowbar; black, green, silver, yes, but red, never." Edgar Must, make, mental, note... No, red, crowbars.
Red Arrow Jag Posted January 10, 2008 Posted January 10, 2008 Wasn't the seat on early Spitfire's a red colour? The seats on Mk1 Spits were made of aluminium alloy and painted green. The 'red' ones are Bakelite (modern restoration uses carbon fibre) found on later marques...much lighter, Mk1's could afford the heavy metal seats as they had less armour plate and no heavy cannons! Restorers at Duxford has made one for there Mk1...
perry Posted January 10, 2008 Posted January 10, 2008 Must, make, mental, note... No, red, crowbars. I can see everyone having a quick colour check of their crowbars...
chadders Posted January 10, 2008 Posted January 10, 2008 No red crow bars eh? I have 1 word for that... BUGGER BUGGER BUGGER (1 WORD 3 TIMES). At least I was right to delete it on my BoB models Mark
Guest les Posted January 10, 2008 Posted January 10, 2008 The "plastic" seat was introduced (as an extra option, not a replacement) from 14-5-1940. It was strengthened 19-4-1942. The crowbar wasn't introduced until 4-11-1941. Rear armour protection was introduced from 6-2-1940. Since this is BRITmodeller, the dates are d/m/y, before anyone asks Edgar Ws the red seat an optional extra, also I belive power steering was optional but air con standard on all models,
StephenMG Posted January 10, 2008 Posted January 10, 2008 (edited) The 'red' ones are Bakelite No, not Bakelite but SRBP (Synthetic Resin Bonded Paper) otherwise known by trade names such as Tufnol, Paxolin etc.. Bakelite is a hard, brittle, black/brown coloured plastic. It was used for lots of things in old aeroplanes though (switch bodies, knobs, etc., etc.) but not for Spitfire seats. SRBF (similar to SRBP but made using layers of fabric instead of paper) was also used for instrument panels etc. too. I'll get back to my pedants cave now! Edited January 10, 2008 by StephenMG
Troffa Posted January 10, 2008 Posted January 10, 2008 (edited) No, not Bakelite but SRBF (Synthetic Resin Bonded Fabric) otherwise known by trade names such as Tufnol, Paxolin etc.. Bakelite is a hard, brittle, black/brown coloured plastic. It was used for lots of things in old aeroplanes though (switch bodies, knobs, etc., etc.) but not for Spitfire seats. SRBF was also used for instrument panels etc. too.I'll get back to my pedants cave now! Getting out of my pedants cave I have a photocopy of a page from AP2280A (B&C) that covers Seafires Mk I to III and it states "The seat is a bakelite moulding and is attached to the mounting by four links..." So it would appear that either the seafire had a "bakelite" seat or a seat that was made from a material mistaken as "bakelite" by the Technical authors. As the seafires in question were simply navalised versions of the Spitfires at the time I would guess that the same seat could found in them as well. I got this page and a few others copied a few years ago when I started work at a certain west country aircraft manufacturer, and they had some records left over from wartime production. I don't have a scanner but will see if I can get a digital photo of the extract and post it later.. Here you go.. Cheers Troffa Edited January 10, 2008 by Troffa
Edgar Posted January 10, 2008 Posted January 10, 2008 I wonder if those technical authors were the same ones, who called Sky duck egg blue? Vickers only referred to it as the plastic seat, no mention of bakelite anywhere. Edgar
Troffa Posted January 11, 2008 Posted January 11, 2008 I wonder if those technical authors were the same ones, who called Sky duck egg blue? Vickers only referred to it as the plastic seat, no mention of bakelite anywhere.Edgar Hi Edgar, I agree that it can be problematic when we modellers want to rely on contemporary documentation as the last word in accuracy on a subject. I know from personal experience that the people writing the AP may not have any meaningful contact with the aircraft or its systems and that errors can and do occur, but on the other hand it is also easy to see where the "bakelite" seat proponents get their convictions from, if the plastic seat is referred to as a "bakelite" seat in official documentation of the period its difficult to discount. All primary research is beneficial for the hobby and forums such as this expand the knowledge of the community as a whole, but we all have to realise that there is very often no definitive answers available to a lot of the questions that we as modellers pose. Here are a couple of shots from the same AP with the seafire parts schedule, note the use of "seat, plastic" Note also that the seats, "plastic, group" and "metal, group" change part numbers and presumably configuration when installed in Seafires later than the Mk1b Its a funny old game! Cheers, Troffa
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now